THE old telephone exchange building in Kidderminster has been described as a magnet for anti-social behaviour and branded a "time bomb waiting to happen", by a Wyre Forest district councillor.
Helen Dyke, chairman of Kidderminster Retail Initiative Security Partnership, wants action taken to properly secure the landmark building in Blackwell Street.
She said: "It is in a terrible condition. There are problems with health and safety and its condition encourages acts of anti-social behaviour.
"It can also be used as a safe hiding place for individuals hiding from the police while it is very difficult to contact the owners of the property to take action."
Mrs Dyke, a Liberal Democrat district councillor, explained: "The building presents serious implications for the fire and police services and is a time bomb waiting for something to go wrong."
PC Clive Llewellyn, local policing officer for Kidderminster town centre, said: "We are aware that groups of youths are going into the premises.
"There are concerns about safety and we have tried to work closely with the owners and various agencies to improve the security of the premises and prevent any unauthorised entry.
"We are aware various planning proposals have been submitted over the years, but as far as we are aware none of the plans have come to fruition.
"We would welcome redevelopment which would improve the safety and security of the premises."
Alec Mackie, Hereford and Worcester Fire and Rescue Service spokesman, said: "The building is owned by a property developer and together with the police and Wyre Forest District Council we have been in discussion with the developer to take action to board the place up more securely.
"Since that has happened we have not had any problems but we understand the building is still used by itinerants as well as allegedly for drug abuse."
Mr Mackie suggested the district council had powers to board up the premises if the owners failed to take action but said he did not believe, from his perspective, there was currently any need to take the step.
A recent planning application to build 54 apartments and retail units on the site was turned down because of concerns over a lack of disabled access.
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article